Last changed: 5 Jan 2006
This file is http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cosy/inanimate-spatial-general/axs-fido-inanimate.html

Inanimate Occupants of Space

These things maybe perceived by fido, acted on by fido, thought about, referred to in conversation, and used in various ways.

In general understanding things in the environment includes being able to predict consequences of actions, or of currently observed states (including motion). It may also be used in explaning how things got as they are, and in designing new objects to be assembled, or routes to be followed, etc.

The various spaces mentioned here can be occupied by many different sorts of objects that a domestic robot will need to know about, some of them inanimate and inactive, others active, or at least mobile or in some cases not merely active but also animate or intelligent.

The objects will vary in many different 'orthogonal' dimensions about which the robot will have to learn, though maybe some subset can be innate. (For kitty probably everything will have to be innate, so that we can understand the nature of the requirements for learning as a result of trying to program direcly the consequences that learning would produce.)

For a more extended discussion of the orthogonal dimensions (or the 'basis functions' for generating a variety of physical situations and processes) see the discussion in this presentation on vision: http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cosy/papers/#pr0505

TO BE EXTENDED

Note: for Kitty the variation in physical contexts will be very constrained, as indicated here.