<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE MD PUBLIC "http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/modules/MD.dtd" "../../MD.dtd">

<MD code="02483" academic-yr="2003">

<LastUpdate>2 July 2003</LastUpdate>

<Aims>

<Aim>
present and discuss some of the fascinating philosophical problems
that are thrown up by cognitive science and cognate disciplines
</Aim>

<Aim>
show that the best way in which to approach a philosophical problem
is by using an anti-justificationist methodology
</Aim>

<Aim>
encourage students to construct their own theories and to appreciate
the value of pluralism, Feyerabend's principle of proliferation
and Bartley's pancritical rationalism
</Aim>

</Aims>

<Outcomes>

<Outcome>
identify some of the key philosophical problems thrown up by 
work being done in cognitive science and related discipline
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
tackle a philosophical problem using an anti-justification
methodology
<Assessed>Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
appreciate the importance of pluralism, proliferation and
pancritical rationalism
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
distinguish between philosophical problems and other sorts of problem
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
use an anti-justificationist methodology
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>e
evaluate proposed theories within cognitive science
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
pick an interesting philosophical problem to investigate
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
criticise a theory by showing that it fails to solve any problem whatsoever
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
criticise a theory by showing that it fails to solve a problem adequately
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
avoid asking what-is questions
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
put the method of multiple working hypotheses into practice
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
appreciate the importance of the belief-filter component of an android
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
appreciate the complexity of the task of designing the belief-filter
component of an android
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
avoid the dangers of ultimate commitment
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
distinguish between justification and criticism
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
appreciate the errors involved in the strategy of attacking foundations
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
recognise when the strategy of attacking foundations is being used
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

<Outcome>
distinguish between good and bad methodology
<Assessed>
Continuous Assessment
</Assessed>
</Outcome>

</Outcomes>

<Prereqs>
<P>
None
</P>
</Prereqs>

<Coreqs>
<P>
None
</P>
</Coreqs>

<Teaching>
<P>
Ten 1 hr weekly lectures.
</P>
</Teaching>

<ContactHrs>
10
</ContactHrs>

<Assessment>
<P>
Continuous assessment (100%).
</P>
<P>The continuous assessment consists of a 3000 word essay.</P>
</Assessment>

<Summary>
Some of the fascinating philosophical problems thrown up
by cognitive science and related disciplines will be presented.
Philosophical problems are notoriously difficult to solve,
so a methodology will be presented to enable students to tackle them.
Students will be shown the advantages of
pluralism, proliferation and pancritical rationalism.
</Summary>

<Syllabus>
<Topic>Introduction:
assessment;
style of presentation;
philosophical background;
methodology;
content and topics;
treat the essay as a mini-project;
possible case studies to be used throughout the module
(`Can computers think?',
`Is the Turing test adequate to determine whether computers can think?',
`Can physical systems think?',
`Can Chinese rooms think?',
`Can connectionist networks think?',
`Can computers think in images?',
`Do computers have to be conscious to think?',
`Are thinking computers mathematically possible?').
</Topic>

<Topic>
Disciplines:
why what-is questions are best avoided;
academic disciplines are useful for administrators but not researchers;
essentialism and nominalism;
theories and larger units (scientific research programmes,
paradigms, research traditions);
the computational-representational understanding of mind;
the CRUM research programme;
metaphysical research programmes.
</Topic>

<Topic>
Philosophy:
rationale for studying;
methodological rules;
bad methodology (what-is questions, definition,
premature implementation, induction);
good methodology (nominalism, proliferation, anti-justificationism,
thought-out implementation, the method of multiple working hypotheses
and pluralism);
background;
epistemology (the bucket theory of the mind,
the belief-filter component of an android, testimony).
</Topic>

<Topic>
Definitions:
terminology,
what-is questions;
essentialism;
real;
abbreviatory;
bad advice 'Define your terms!';
etymological fallacy;
family resemblance;
Popper's table of ideas;
infinite regress.
</Topic>

<Topic>
Problems:
psychology and AI;
inconsistencies;
facts;
difficulties;
questions;
search problems;
philosophical
(change,
personal identity,
body-mind,
other minds,
universals,
testimony,
free will);
Tye's
(ownership,
mechanism,
phenomenal causation,
duplicates);
epistemological (justificationist, anti-justificationist,
belief-filter component);
non-philosophical (practical, theoretical, historical, mathematical);
methodological advice;
erotetic narratology.
</Topic>

<Topic>
Philosophy of science and creativity:
problems as starting points;
Popper's tetradic schema;
creativity (Hadamard, Evans);
context of discovery and criticism;
the myth of induction.
</Topic>

<Topic>
Explanation and prediction:
covering law model; poor methodology;
falsification as good methodology:
`We predict by reference to our present theories;
we learn by refuting our present theories' (Bartley).
</Topic>

<Topic>
Philosophy of mind:
mind-body problem;
Popper's three worlds;
Tye's ten problems of consciousness;
functionalism;
closed-world assumption;
hierarchical organisation of reality;
reduction;
emergence;
upward and downward causation;
evolution.
</Topic>

<Topic>
Belief-filter component:
ultimate goal of AI;
philosophical problem of testimony;
rationalism (uncritical or comprehensive, pancritical);
Reid's principle of credulity;
Price's principle of trust;
the strategy of attacking foundations and Searle's use of;
how not to win an argument (Gilbert);
infinite regress;
ultimate commitment;
irrationalism and relativism.
</Topic>
</Syllabus>

<Books>

<Book>
<Title>
The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul
</Title>
<Author>
Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett (editors)
</Author>
<Publisher>
Penguin Books
</Publisher>
<Year>
1982
</Year>
<Comment>
thought-provoking essays and stories
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Knowledge and the Body-mind Problem
</Title>
<Author>
Karl Popper
</Author>
<Publisher>
Routledge
</Publisher>
<Year>
1994
</Year>
<Comment>
relationship between mind and body;
three worlds;
dualism
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
The Retreat to Commitment (second edition)
</Title>
<Author>
W. W. Bartley III
</Author>
<Publisher>
Open Court
</Publisher>
<Year>
1984
</Year>
<Comment>
ultimate commitment;
anti-justificationism;
infinite regress;
difference between justificationist and anti-justificationist criticism
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
The Self and its Brain
</Title>
<Author>
K. R. Popper and J. Eccles
</Author>
<Publisher>
Routledge
</Publisher>
<Year>
1977
</Year>
<Comment>
relationship between mind and body;
three worlds;
upward and downward causation; dualism
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Consciousness Explained
</Title>
<Author>
Daniel C. Dennett
</Author>
<Publisher>
Penguin
</Publisher>
<Year>
1993
</Year>
<Comment>
current issues
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Objective Knowledge
</Title>
<Author>
Karl Popper
</Author>
<Publisher>
OUP
</Publisher>
<Year>
1975
</Year>
<Comment>
three worlds;
bucket theory of the mind;
tetradic schema;
evolutionary epistemology
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Unended Quest
</Title>
<Author>
Karl Popper
</Author>
<Publisher>
Routledge
</Publisher>
<Year>
1992
</Year>
<Comment>
three worlds;
tetradic schema;
evolutionary epistemology
anti-essentialist exhortation;
table of idea
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Proofs and Refutations
</Title>
<Author>
Imre Lakatos
</Author>
<Publisher>
CUP
</Publisher>
<Year>
1976
</Year>
<Comment>
Criticism of Euclidean methodology;
anti-justificationism
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
</Title>
<Author>
Margaret Boden (editor)
</Author>
<Publisher>
OUP
</Publisher>
<Year>
1990
</Year>
<Comment>
current issues;
overview of the subject
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
The Philosophy of Artificial Life
</Title>
<Author>
Margaret Boden (editor)
</Author>
<Publisher>
OUP
</Publisher>
<Year>
1996
</Year>
<Comment>
current issues;
overview of the subject
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences
</Title>
<Author>
Robert A. Wilson and Frank C. Keil (editors)
</Author>
<Publisher>
MIT
</Publisher>
<Year>
1999
</Year>
<Comment>
encyclopaedia
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind
</Title>
<Author>
Samuel Guttenplan (editor)
</Author>
<Publisher>
Blackwell
</Publisher>
<Year>
1995
</Year>
<Comment>
current issues
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
A Companion to Cognitive Science
</Title>
<Author>
William Bechtel and George Graham (editors)
</Author>
<Publisher>
Blackwell
</Publisher>
<Year>
1998
</Year>
<Comment>
up-to-date guide
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Toward a Psychology of Being (third edition)
</Title>
<Author>
Abraham Maslow
</Author>
<Publisher>
Wiley
</Publisher>
<Year>
1998
</Year>
<Comment>
the importance of peak experiences to creativity
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Testimony: A Philosophical Study
</Title>
<Author>
C. A. J. Coady
</Author>
<Publisher>
OUP
</Publisher>
<Year>
1992
</Year>
<Comment>
testimony;
belief-filter component
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Android Epistemology
</Title>
<Author>
Kenneth M. Ford, Clark Glymour and Patrick J. Hayes (editors)
</Author>
<Publisher>
MIT Press
</Publisher>
<Year>
1995
</Year>
<Comment>
fun collection of essays
</Comment>
</Book>

<Book>
<Title>
Ten Problems of Consciousness
</Title>
<Author>
Michael Tye
</Author>
<Publisher>
MIT Press
</Publisher>
<Year>
1995
</Year>
<Comment>
interesting problems
</Comment>
</Book>

</Books>

<Links>

<P>
Further information about this module,
including any last-minute changes,
corrections and alterations to the information
contained above, can be found on my
<A href = "http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~ard/modules/pcs.html">
Philosophy of Cognitive Science module web page
</A>.
</P>

</Links>

</MD>