A human study of patch maintainability

Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.3872

@InProceedings{Fry:2012:ISSTA,
  author =       "Zachary P. Fry and Bryan Landau and Westley Weimer",
  title =        "A human study of patch maintainability",
  booktitle =    "Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on
                 Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2012",
  year =         "2012",
  editor =       "Zhendong Su",
  pages =        "177--187",
  address =      "Minneapolis, MN, USA",
  publisher_address = "New York, NY, USA",
  month =        "15-20 " # jul,
  publisher =    "ACM",
  keywords =     "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, SBSE",
  isbn13 =       "978-1-4503-1454-1",
  URL =          "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2338965.2336775",
  DOI =          "doi:10.1145/2338965.2336775",
  acmid =        "2336775",
  size =         "11 pages",
  abstract =     "Identifying and fixing defects is a crucial and
                 expensive part of the software lifecycle. Measuring the
                 quality of bug-fixing patches is a difficult task that
                 affects both functional correctness and the future
                 maintainability of the code base. Recent research
                 interest in automatic patch generation makes a
                 systematic understanding of patch maintainability and
                 understandability even more critical.

                 We present a human study involving over 150
                 participants, 32 real-world defects, and 40 distinct
                 patches. In the study, humans perform tasks that
                 demonstrate their understanding of the control flow,
                 state, and maintainability aspects of code patches. As
                 a baseline we use both human-written patches that were
                 later reverted and also patches that have stood the
                 test of time to ground our results. To address any
                 potential lack of readability with machine-generated
                 patches, we propose a system wherein such patches are
                 augmented with synthesised, human-readable
                 documentation that summarises their effects and
                 context. Our results show that machine-generated
                 patches are slightly less maintainable than
                 human-written ones, but that trend reverses when
                 machine patches are augmented with our synthesized
                 documentation. Finally, we examine the relationship
                 between code features (such as the ratio of variable
                 uses to assignments) with participants' abilities to
                 complete the study tasks and thus explain a portion of
                 the broad concept of patch quality.",
  notes =        "Does not mention GP but GP used in their
                 machine-generated patches
                 \cite{LeGoues:2012:ICSE}

                 http://crisys.cs.umn.edu/issta2012/",
}

Genetic Programming entries for Zachary P Fry Bryan Alexander Landau Westley Weimer

Citations