Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.2031
@InProceedings{mcphee:2001:astamsbgplr,
author = "Nicholas Freitag McPhee and Riccardo Poli and
Jonathan E. Rowe",
title = "A Schema Theory Analysis of Mutation Size Biases in
Genetic Programming with Linear Representations",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary
Computation CEC2001",
year = "2001",
pages = "1078--1085",
address = "COEX, World Trade Center, 159 Samseong-dong,
Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea",
publisher_address = "445 Hoes Lane, P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ
08855-1331, USA",
month = "27-30 " # may,
organisation = "IEEE Neural Network Council (NNC), Evolutionary
Programming Society (EPS), Institution of Electrical
Engineers (IEE)",
publisher = "IEEE Press",
keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, schema
theory, mutation, linear representation, size bias",
ISBN = "0-7803-6658-1",
URL = "
http://cswww.essex.ac.uk/staff/poli/papers/McPhee-CEC2001.pdf",
URL = "
http://cswww.essex.ac.uk/staff/poli/papers/postscript/McPhee-CEC2001.ps.gz",
URL = "
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/502355.html",
URL = "
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/501380.html",
abstract = "Understanding operator bias in evolutionary
computation is important because it is possible for the
operator's biases to work against the intended biases
induced by the fitness function. In recent work we
showed how developments in GP schema theory can be used
to better understand the biases induced by the standard
subtree crossover when genetic programming is applied
to variable length linear structures. We use the schema
theory to better understand the biases induced on
linear structures by two common GP subtree mutation
operators: FULL and GROW mutation. In both cases we
find that the operators do have quite specific biases
and typically strongly oversample shorter strings.",
notes = "CEC-2001 - A joint meeting of the IEEE, Evolutionary
Programming Society, Galesia, and the IEE.
IEEE Catalog Number = 01TH8546C,
Library of Congress Number = .
linear (unary) tree schemata. flat fitness landscape.
biases of full mutation, grow mutation,
No fitness. Full(unary) average length = 2*D-1.
Limiting size distribution: 0 for size < D, flat region
size < 2D, rapid falling size>=2D. Similar to subtree
crossover. Grow(unary) discrete gamma distribution (cf.
\cite{Rowe01} ) cf subtree crossover.
{"}ones then zeros{"} unary problem. Subtree crossover
bloat (at least to 75 generations). full no bloat,
actually as with no fitness, {"}artifact of this
particular problem{"}. Grow similar to no fitness.",
}
Genetic Programming entries for Nicholas Freitag McPhee Riccardo Poli Jonathan E Rowe